Elsevier

Social Science Research

Volume 39, Issue 5, September 2010, Pages 725-738
Social Science Research

Exploring actor and partner correlates of sexual satisfaction among married couples

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.09.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Using the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction, we consider how infidelity, pornography consumption, marital satisfaction, sexual frequency, premarital sex, and cohabitation are associated with married couples’ sexual satisfaction. Data from 433 couples are analyzed with structural equation models to determine the contributions of (a) each respondent’s predictors (actor effects) and (b) his/her spouse’s predictors (partner effects). No gender differences in actor and partner effects emerge. Marital satisfaction and sexual frequency act as rewards and increase sexual satisfaction. A partner effect emerges for marital infidelity, suggesting that a spouse’s infidelity is costly for sexual satisfaction. Finally, some evidence suggests that pornography consumption is costly for own and spouse’s sexual satisfaction, especially when pornography is used by only one spouse.

Introduction

Sexuality is a key component of the marriage relationship. Not surprisingly, there is a high correlation between satisfaction with one’s sexual relationship and satisfaction with the overall relationship (Henderson-King and Veroff, 1994, Sprecher and Cate, 2004, Young et al., 1998). Sexual satisfaction is also linked to union stability (Edwards and Booth, 1994, Oggins et al., 1993, White and Keith, 1990, Yabiku and Gager, forthcoming). Despite the importance of the sexual relationship to the marriage relationship, there has been relatively little scholarly work on the topic. This may be because sex within committed relationships is not considered abnormal or problematic and many view the topic as private or even taboo (Call et al., 1995, Christopher and Sprecher, 2000, Laumann et al., 1994). Yet, because of its significant relationship with overall relationship satisfaction, the topic of sexuality within marriage is important to explore.

Our research on sexual satisfaction among married couples makes two important contributions. First, within the framework of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction (IEMSS), we consider unique correlates of sexual satisfaction, including each partner’s use of pornography and history of infidelity, as well as whether the couple waited until marriage to have sex with each other and whether they cohabited with each other or other partners before marriage. In addition, we consider the effects of marital satisfaction and frequency of sex, more commonly used predictor variables in the IEMSS framework. Second, we add to the literature on sexual satisfaction by using dyadic data and rigorous dyadic analytic techniques, using newly collected data from 433 married couples (N = 866 individuals). Although relationship scholars are increasingly interviewing both spouses in couples, the use of “best-practice” analytic methods for dyads is less common (Kashy et al., 2006). To model the non-independence of dyad members, our analysis uses the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model (Kashy and Kenny, 2000), which proposes that both the respondent’s predictor variables (actor effects) and respondent’s partner’s predictor variables (partner effects) influence the respondent’s outcome variable. Because some important gender differences in sexuality (Oliver and Hyde, 1993, Peplau, 2003) and marriage (Nock, 2001) have been documented, we also test for gender differences in actor and partner effects. By analyzing couple-level data with dyadic techniques, we can explore the differences between husbands and wives and between actors and partners, enabling a better understanding of the dynamics of sexual satisfaction among heterosexual married couples.

Section snippets

Dyadic data

Although most sexual activity involves two people, much of what we know about sexuality is based on studies that have collected data from individuals (DeLamater and Hyde, 2004). For instance, the National Health and Social Life Survey (NHSLS) (Laumann et al., 1994, Michael et al., 1994; used by e.g., Liu, 2000, Treas and Giesen, 2000, Waite and Joyner, 2001), which arguably is the greatest source of sexual behavior among American adults, studied one adult per household rather than couples.

Satisfaction with sexual activity

Married couples are generally sexually satisfied (Edwards and Booth, 1994, Lawrance and Byers, 1995, Oggins et al., 1993). The NHSLS found that 88% of married adults were either “extremely” or “very” physically pleased in their relationship (Laumann et al., 1994) and 85% were emotionally satisfied (Michael et al., 1994). In this study, we explore how infidelity, pornography consumption, marital satisfaction, frequency of sex, whether the couple waited until marriage to have sex, and premarital

The Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction

The social exchange framework draws attention to the exchange of material or symbolic resources between people (Sprecher, 1998). In some ways, a sexual relationship can be considered an interpersonal exchange of rewards and costs. Rewards are satisfying exchanges, such as having fun during sex, while costs are those exchanges which produce anguish or result in a loss, such as having one’s sexual advances ignored (Lawrance and Byers, 1995, Sprecher, 1998). Using the social exchange framework,

Research questions

Our research addresses five questions. First, how are one’s own feelings and behaviors associated with one’s own report of sexual satisfaction? In other words, what actor effects appear in the correlates of sexual satisfaction? Second, are the actor effects equal for wives and husbands? Third, can we improve our understanding of the correlates of sexual satisfaction by including spousal information; or, are there any partner effects? Fourth, are there gender differences in partner effects?

Data and methods

We use data from the Marriage and Relationship Survey (MARS), a new survey of 433 married couples (also used by Lichter and Carmalt, 2009). The survey was constructed by the second author and colleagues and was implemented by Knowledge Networks (KN) with probability samples of persons who are members of a web-enabled panel designed to be representative of the U.S. population (Knowledge Networks, 2008). The KN panel is the first online research panel based on probability sampling and is derived

Descriptive findings

Descriptive statistics for all variables are displayed in Table 1. Wives and husbands report relatively high marital satisfaction, with 77% of wives and 82% of husbands coded as maritally satisfied. Husbands are significantly more likely than wives to report high marital satisfaction (p < .01). On average, couples had sex about six times in the previous month, which corresponds with research using the National Survey of Families and Households (Call et al., 1995, Rao and DeMaris, 1995), the NHSLS

Discussion

Using the social exchange framework and data from a sample of 433 married couples, we explore the correlates of sexual satisfaction for wives and husbands. We demonstrate that marriage is a complex, mutual relationship characterized by spousal interdependence. Our couple-level data are analyzed within the frameworks of the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) and the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction (IEMSS), which call attention to the dyadic nature of the marital

Acknowledgments

The data collection for this research was supported by the Initiative in Population Research at The Ohio State University. The authors wish to thank Daniel T. Lichter, Douglas B. Downey, and Donna Bobbitt-Zeher for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References (80)

  • S.L. Brown et al.

    Links between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital quality, stability, and divorce: a comparison of covenant versus standard marriages

    Social Science Research

    (2006)
  • D.T. Lichter et al.

    Religion and marital quality among low-income couples

    Social Science Research

    (2009)
  • P.D. Allison

    Missing Data

    (2002)
  • R. Bergner et al.

    The significance of heavy pornography involvement for romantic partners: research and clinical implications

    Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy

    (2002)
  • A. Booth et al.

    Premarital cohabitation and marital success

    Journal of Family Issues

    (1988)
  • A.J. Bridges et al.

    Romantic partners’ use of pornography: its significance for women

    Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy

    (2003)
  • L.L. Bumpass et al.

    Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States

    Population Studies

    (2000)
  • E.W. Burgess et al.

    Courtship, Engagement, and Marriage

    (1954)
  • B. Butzer et al.

    Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: a study of married couples

    Personal Relationships

    (2008)
  • E.S. Byers

    Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: a longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships

    Journal of Sex Research

    (2005)
  • E.S. Byers et al.

    Further validation of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction

    Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy

    (2006)
  • V. Call et al.

    The incidence and frequency of marital sex in a national sample

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (1995)
  • L. Campbell et al.

    Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using Proc Mixed and HLM: a user-friendly guide

    Personal Relationships

    (2002)
  • Chandra, A., Martinez, G.M., Mosher, W.D., Abma, J.C., Jones, J., 2005. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive...
  • F.S. Christopher et al.

    Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: a decade review

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (2000)
  • W.L. Cook et al.

    The actor–partner interdependence model: a model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies

    International Journal of Behavior Development

    (2005)
  • M.P. Couper

    Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches

    Public Opinion Quarterly

    (2000)
  • W.R. Cupach et al.

    The role of sexual attitude similarity in romantic heterosexual relationships

    Personal Relationships

    (1995)
  • Daneback, K., Traeen, B., Mansson, S.A., 2008. Use of pornography in a random sample of Norwegian heterosexual couples....
  • S. Davies et al.

    Sexual desire discrepancies: effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples

    Archives of Sexual Behavior

    (1999)
  • J. DeLamater et al.

    Conceptual and theoretical issues in studying sexuality in close relationships

  • A. DeMaris et al.

    Cohabitation with the future spouse: its influence upon marital satisfaction and communication

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (1984)
  • A. DeMaris et al.

    Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability in the United States: a reassessment

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (1992)
  • D.A. Dillman et al.

    Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method

    (2009)
  • D.A. Donnelly

    Sexually inactive marriages

    Journal of Sex Research

    (1993)
  • J.N. Edwards et al.

    Sexuality, marriage, and well-being: the middle years

  • R. Forste et al.

    Sexual exclusivity among dating, cohabiting, and married women

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (1996)
  • Gonzalez, R., Griffin, D., 1997. On the statistics of interdependence: treating dyadic data with respect. In: Duck, S....
  • R. Gonzalez et al.

    The correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the distinguishable case

    Personal Relationships

    (1999)
  • I. Gossmann et al.

    Determinants of sex initiation frequencies and sexual satisfaction in long-term couples’ relationships

    The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality

    (2003)
  • A.M. Greeley

    Faithful attraction: Discovering Intimacy, Love and Fidelity in American Marriages

    (1991)
  • E. Haavio-Mannila et al.

    Correlates of increased sexual satisfaction

    Archives of Sexual Behavior

    (1997)
  • M.G. Haselton et al.

    The affective shift hypothesis: The functions of emotional changes following sexual intercourse

    Personal Relationships

    (2001)
  • D.H. Henderson-King et al.

    Sexual satisfaction and marital well-being in the first years of marriage

    Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

    (1994)
  • D. Julien et al.

    Insiders’ views of marital sex: a dyadic analysis

    Journal of Sex Research

    (1992)
  • D.A. Kashy et al.

    The analysis of data from dyads and groups

  • D.A. Kashy et al.

    Advances in data analytic approaches for relationships research: the broad utility of hierarchical linear modeling

  • D.A. Kenny et al.

    Partner effects in relationship research: conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations

    Personal Relationships

    (1999)
  • D.A. Kenny et al.

    Dyadic Data Analysis

    (2006)
  • Knowledge Networks, 2008. KnowledgePanel. <http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/knpanel/index.html/> (retrieved...
  • Cited by (130)

    • Predictors of Sexual Satisfaction in Women: A Systematic Review

      2021, Sexual Medicine Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, Kluck et al81 and McNulty and Widman82,83 proposed the new constructs sexual perfectionism and sexual narcissism which received little attention in other analyses so far. The omission of the mentioned variables could contribute to ambiguous findings about the alleged negative effects of other predictors of sexual satisfaction such as age or relationship duration as noted by Frederick et al2 and Frost et al.3 Similarly, the contradictory results about the effects of pornography consumption raise questions about appropriate statistical modeling and the inclusion of control variables as done by Yucel and Gassanov.51 While many variables for the explanation of sexuality have been considered as potential predictors of sexual satisfaction, there is no frequently applied theoretical model to explain sexual satisfaction.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text