Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Women’s Rape Fantasies: An Empirical Evaluation of the Major Explanations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated explanations of rape fantasy in a sample of female undergraduates (N = 355) using a sexual fantasy checklist which included eight types of rape fantasy, participants’ detailed descriptions of a rape fantasy they have had, a rape fantasy scenario audio presentation, and measures of personality. Three explanations of rape fantasy were tested: openness to sexual experience, sexual desirability, and sexual blame avoidance. Women who were higher in erotophilia and self-esteem and who had more frequent consensual sexual fantasies and more frequent desirability fantasies, particularly of performing as a stripper, had more frequent rape fantasies. Women who were higher in erotophilia, openness to fantasy, desirability fantasies, and self-esteem reported greater sexual arousal to rape fantasies. Sexual blame avoidance theory was not supported; sexual desirability theory was moderately supported; openness to sexual experience theory received the strongest support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Descriptions in parentheses are shortened forms of the items that have been used for brevity in text and tables.

References

  • Bivona, J. M., & Critelli, J. W. (2009). The nature of women’s rape rantasies: An analysis of prevalence, frequency, and contents. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 33–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO five-factor inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critelli, J. W., & Bivona, J. M. (2008). Women’s erotic rape fantasies: An evaluation of theory and research. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 57–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deditius-Island, H. K., & Caruso, J. C. (2002). An examination of the reliability of scores from Zuckerman’s Sensation Seeking Scales, Form V. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 728–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., White, L. A., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S. R., Balzano, B. F., & Stamey, R. (1991). Two studies of females’ sexual force fantasies. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy, 17, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grömping, U. (2006). Relative importance for linear regression in R: The package Relaimpo. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariton, E. B. (1973). The sexual fantasies of women. Psychology Today, 6, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariton, E. B., & Singer, J. L. (1974). Women’s fantasies during sexual intercourse: Normative and theoretical implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 313–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, F. E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, F. E. (2012). rms: Regression modeling strategies. R package version 3.4-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms. Accessed 15 January 2012.

  • Hawley, P. H., & Hensley, W. A. (2009). Social dominance and forceful submission fantasies: Feminine pathology or power? Journal of Sex Research, 46, 568–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, H. (1983). Endless rapture. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J., LoPiccolo, L., & LoPiccolo, J. (1976). Becoming orgasmic: A sexual growth program for women. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanin, E. J. (1982). Female rape fantasies: A victimization study. Victimology: An International Journal, 7, 114–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knafo, D., & Jaffe, Y. (1984). Sexual fantasizing in males and females. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, W. (1987). Relative importance by averaging over orderings. American Statistician, 41, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, R. H., Merenda, P. F., & Gold, R. Z. (1980). Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1995). The effects of sympathetic activation on physiological and subjective sexual arousal in women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 651–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moreault, D., & Follingstad, D. R. (1978). Sexual fantasies of females as a function of sex guilt and experimental response cues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1385–1393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L., Barton-Henry, M., & Green, S. E. (1988). Subjective sexual arousal and involvement theory: Development of multiple indicators. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 412–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

  • Pelletier, L. A., & Herold, E. S. (1988). The relationship of age, sex guilt, and sexual experience with female sexual fantasies. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C., & Symons, D. (2003). Warrior lovers: Erotic fiction, evolution, and female sexuality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, J. L., & Horne, S. G. (2006). Guilty or not? A path model of women’s forceful sexual fantasies. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 368–377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. (1999). An analysis of empirical estimates of sexual aggression victimization and perpetration. Violence and Victims, 14, 241–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strassberg, D. S., & Lockerd, L. K. (1998). Force in women’s sexual fantasies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 403–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suschinsky, K. D., & Lalumière, M. L. (2011). Prepared for anything? An investigation of female genital arousal in response to rape cues. Psychological Science, 22, 159–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, C. (1987). The romance revolution: Erotic novels for women and the quest for a new sexual identity. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal, 6(1), 58–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s alpha, Revelle’s beta, McDonald’s omega: Their relations with each and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioural expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph W. Critelli.

Appendix: Rape Fantasy Items

Appendix: Rape Fantasy Items

How often do you fantasize about each of the following?

  1. 1.

    Being overpowered or forced by a man to surrender sexually against my will (forced sex by a man)Footnote 1

  2. 2.

    Being overpowered or forced by a woman to surrender sexually against my will (forced sex by a woman)

  3. 3.

    Being overpowered or forced into a sexual act against my will because I was incapacitated due to drugs, alcohol or sleep (incapacitated)

  4. 4.

    Being overpowered or forced by a man to give him oral sex (forced oral sex by a man)

  5. 5.

    Being overpowered or forced by a woman to give her oral sex (forced oral sex by a woman)

  6. 6.

    Being overpowered or forced to have anal sex (forced anal sex)

  7. 7.

    Being raped by a man (raped by a man)

  8. 8.

    Being raped by a woman (raped by a woman)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bivona, J.M., Critelli, J.W. & Clark, M.J. Women’s Rape Fantasies: An Empirical Evaluation of the Major Explanations. Arch Sex Behav 41, 1107–1119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9934-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9934-6

Keywords

Navigation